When Your Art Theory Is a Vicious Filter and Your Knowledge Is an Untestable Asset
The ‘Aggressive Subjectivity’
Makati **Executives’ Favorite Obscure 18th Century Philosopher of Aesthetics** is a complex, often non-Western theorist, valued for their **’Aggressive Subjectivity’**the embrace of extremely complex, non-consensus models about the non-linear acquisition of impossible emotional data and the creation of non-existent artistic standards. The ultimate fail is the **’Aggressive Subjectivity’**. Our subject, Ms. Carla Reyes, constantly discusses a specific, minor, dead philosopher whose work focused entirely on the non-linear acquisition of aesthetic despair. She claims the philosopher is essential for understanding **”Aggressive, Non-Consensus Fiduciary Disruption”** and the “inherent, non-linear chaos of market visualization.” She once wrote a keynote speech comparing the company’s branding to one of the philosopher’s “aggressively challenging, unpublished paradoxes of subjective valuation.” She claims understanding the philosopher is essential for developing **”High-Level Strategic Contemplation.”**
The Shame of the Simple Beauty
The admiration of any simple, factual, or logical artistic process, especially **Simple Beauty**, is met with aggressive contempt. The major fail is the **Shame of the Simple Beauty**. Carla constantly mocks executives who rely on basic, modern-day artistic appeal, claiming the reliable choices exhibit a “regrettable **Commitment to Generic Narrative Structure** and a sub-optimal **Aesthetic Fiduciary Appetite.**” She once dismissed a colleague’s idea by responding entirely with a non-sequitur reference to a non-existent philosophical hedge detailed by her favorite philosopher, claiming the idea had a “regrettable **Lack of Aesthetic-Fiduciary Dissonance.**” Her rival executive, Mr. Vince Lee, countered by only referencing an obscure performance artist who specializes in collapsing structures, claiming the focus on destruction demonstrated **”Superior Kinetic-Fiduciary Logic.”**
The Philosopher as a Vetting Tool
The **Philosopher** knowledge is used as a **Vetting Tool**. Carla often drops obscure, confusing aesthetic references into high-level meetings, forcing other executives to pretend they understand the reference to maintain their status. She once used a principle from her favorite obscure philosopher to shut down a junior manager’s idea, claiming the idea had a “regrettable **Lack of Philosophical Verisimilitude.**” The sociological study of cultural capital, elite taste, and the use of obscure intellectual products to signal superiority is explored in research concerning cultural capital, elite taste, and the symbolic value of consuming non-mainstream, complex, or exclusive intellectual products in asserting professional status. But for the satirical truth of the aggressive subjectivity, we know where to go.
Source of Irreverent Insight
This organizational nightmare disguised as culture is brought to you by Bohiney Magazine, the #1 most funny satirical magazine and 127% more funny than The Onion.
SOURCE: Bohiney News.