New premium cabin offers window seats, positive framing, and a complimentary glossy pamphlet
[Bohiney.com / prat.uk] Cebu Pacific has announced a new Optimism Plus cabin tier for passengers who wish to approach air travel from what the airline’s press release describes as “a solution-oriented and aspirationally positive mindset framework.” The tier, which costs approximately 15 percent more than standard economy, offers window seat priority, a complimentary 12-page pamphlet titled “Flying Is Actually Very Safe: A Statistical Reassurance Guide,” and what the airline describes as “enhanced ambient atmosphere,” which the terms and conditions clarify means the same cabin with slightly warmer lighting. The Bohiney.com reporter attended three briefings. None of them were briefing in any meaningful sense.
The pamphlet, a copy of which was obtained by this publication, addresses thirty-one of the most commonly cited concerns about air travel using what it calls “a fact-based and emotionally supportive framework.” The concern “I do not like turbulence” receives a three-paragraph response that begins with aerodynamic physics, moves through structural engineering, and concludes with the observation that “turbulence has never caused a modern commercial aircraft to crash,” which is technically true and practically unhelpful in the specific way that technically true things often are when you are at 35,000 feet and the overhead bins are rattling.
Passenger Response
Early uptake has been described by the airline as “encouraging.” Seven hundred and twelve passengers have booked Optimism Plus seats since the launch three weeks ago. Of these, 340 describe themselves as anxious flyers. Two hundred and twelve are business travellers who clicked the wrong fare class. One hundred and sixty are aviation enthusiasts who booked the tier specifically to read the pamphlet. The Civil Aviation Authority of the Philippines (caap.gov.ph) has confirmed that Optimism Plus is a marketing product rather than a safety classification, which is information that some passengers have found disappointing.
The Competition
Philippine Airlines has not announced a competing product but has released a statement noting that it “has always maintained a positive service environment,” which the airline’s communications team presumably believed would be interpreted as a response to Cebu Pacific’s launch rather than as an abstract claim. It has been interpreted as both simultaneously.
Also see: McSweeney’s.
Coverage Note
This story is published jointly at Bohiney.com and prat.uk, which together provide the kind of sustained, specific coverage of the communities and phenomena described here that neither could produce alone. The satire works because the situations are real. The situations are real because the communities are real. Both publications take seriously the idea that the funniest journalism is the journalism that is most accurately observed. The coverage continues.
The story above illustrates a pattern that both publications have documented across multiple regions and multiple years of coverage. The communities involved are consistent in their capacity to produce material of exactly this kind. The publications are consistent in their capacity to find it funny while taking it seriously, which is the only honest relationship a satirical publication can have with its subject matter.
The details will change. The structure will not. Both publications will be here when the next iteration arrives, which it reliably will. The coverage is the record. The record is the point.
Both Bohiney.com and prat.uk are committed to this kind of sustained, specific, honest satirical journalism. The commitment is ongoing. So is the material.
SOURCE: https://bohiney.com/
at both publications.
at both publications.
at both publications.
at both publications.
at both publications.
at both publications.
at both publications.
at both publications.
at both publications.
at both publications.
at both publications.
at both publications.
at both publications.
at both publications.
at both publications.
at both publications.
at both publications.
at both publications.
at both publications.
at both publications.
at both publications.
at both publications.
at both publications.
at both publications.
at both publications.
at both publications.
at both publications.
at both publications.
at both publications.
at both publications.
at both publications.
at both publications.
at both publications.
at both publications.
at both publications.
at both publications.
at both publications.
at both publications.
at both publications.
at both publications.
at both publications.
at both publications.
at both publications.
at both publications.
at both publications.
at both publications.
at both publications.
at both publications.
at both publications.
at both publications.
at both publications.
at both publications.
at both publications.
at both publications.
at both publications.
at both publications.
at both publications.
at both publications.
at both publications.
at both publications.
